Service Tag

App for LED lighting technicians in the field. A digital tool to help with the installation and maintenance of street or office lights, reducing service disruption and factory returns.

Two mobile phones showing key screens of the Service Tag app: product info and QR scanner
Two mobile phones showing key screens of the Service Tag app: product info and QR scanner

When

2018 to 2024
for Signify (formerly known as Philips Lighting)

My role

  • Design lead

  • Interaction design

  • Information architecture

  • Visual design contribution

Learnings

  • Setting a way of working with a remote team

  • Tech challenges (eg. GPS)

  • Obstacles to app adoption

  • Responsive design

Photo of a technician installing a streetlight

A pragmatic approach

As a general principle the app encourages repair and reuse, versus costly factory returns and component waste.

It's particularly useful for luminaires lacking Internet access and thus the capability to be remotely handled. Though cities around the world have accelerated their upgrade to connected technology, many older generation lights are still in service and need on-site maintenance.

After identifying the luminaire by scanning its QR code, the user gets a wealth of information and tools to help them execute tasks at all stages of the lifecycle, such as:

  • Installing

  • Late stage tuning

  • Troubleshooting

  • Planning a repair

  • Replacing a broken part

Design choices

Standard navigation and interaction principles make Service Tag intuitive and easy to extend with new features. As we prioritized outdoor usage, we limited the number of actions per view and paid attention to visual simplicity.

Service Tag mobile app screen example 1
Service Tag mobile app screen example 2
Service Tag mobile app screen example 3

Mobile and web

The Android and iOS apps have much in common, being both based on the same design system, Signify Photon. A few UI patterns remain native, such as certain navigation and menu conventions. Branding matters, but it’s more important that the app feels at home on the device of the user.

I later worked on a web adaptation for a new category of users. Office-based managers, they wanted a better integration with their desktop workflow and a more comfortable way to visualize their installation team’s progress.

The app makes the most of each platform. On desktop it’s responsive, map-centric and with a flatter hierarchy. On mobile, it’s more decomposed and gets features that are only used in the field – like NFC and Bluetooth interactions with the hardware.

Service Tag app web and mobile version side by side, showing project stats graphs